Critics Erupt After Clarence Thomas Tells Americans To Deal With It On Roe v. Wade

2 weeks ago 74

Critics were stunned Saturday aft Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas scolded Americans for not accepting arguable rulings — aft his ain woman battled against the results of a morganatic statesmanlike election.

Thomas chided a distraught nationalist successful comments Friday astatine a judicial league successful Atlanta pursuing the leak of a draught Supreme Court sentiment that would gut Roe v. Wade and a fractional period of the close to an abortion.

He complained that Americans are “addicted” to results they want — portion “not surviving with” rulings they oppose. He warned that the tribunal will not beryllium “bullied” successful the look of protest. Declining respect for the instrumentality and institutions, Thomas warned, “bodes sick for a escaped society.”

Thomas detractors were agog. Not lone has his wife, Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, refused to “live with” the statesmanlike election, helium was the sole Supreme Court justness to ballot that erstwhile President Donald Trump should not person gotta merchandise his White House documents to the House committee investigating past year’s insurrection.

Ginni Thomas, who had peculiar entree to the Trump medication due to the fact that of her husband’s position, peppered past White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows with dozens of texts arsenic she worked feverishly to upend the results of the election. That revelation successful March triggered calls for Justice Thomas to recuse himself from each insurrection issues — oregon be impeached.

Question for CT/SCOTUS:

Is it good to beryllium bullied into implicit turning the results of an election? Asking for a ‘friend’.

— Vote Blue To Save Democracy #VoteBluein2022 🌊🌊🌊 (@parrot_this) May 7, 2022

Thomas has besides repeatedly attempted to rip up ineligible precedence acceptable by the court.

“The irony is truthful heavy you wonderment if it’s possibly a Clarence Thomas impersonator,” erstwhile U.S. Attorney Harry Litman said connected MSNBC Saturday.

“Among different things, this is simply a feline who has spent a beingness trying to instrumentality a battering ram to each the Supreme Court large precedents” of law, Litman added. “He’s present saying radical don’t respect the instrumentality enough. That’s adjacent leaving speech each the controversies helium has engendered, arsenic has his wife. It’s conscionable ... remarkable.”

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) wrote that it’s the Supreme Court aiming to “bully’ women “into having government-mandated pregnancies.”

Justice Clarence Thomas is wrong, again. Governments are bullying women into having government-mandated pregnancies, nether menace of jail. Multiple Supreme Court Justices lied during their confirmation process astir their presumption of #RoeVWade and look decisis. Those are the facts.

— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) May 7, 2022

Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) pointed retired adjacent earlier the code that some Thomas and blimpish Justice Brett Kavanaugh were questioned astir credible accusations of intersexual misconduct successful their confirmation hearings, yet are deciding reproductive rights for women.

As a survivor, I americium reasoning astir however Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas are credibly accused of having violated and harassed women and are present the ones astir to contradict america our close to termination care.

Abusers bash not beryllium successful nationalist office. Period.

— Cori Bush (@CoriBush) May 4, 2022

And that was conscionable the beginning.

“We can’t beryllium an instauration that tin beryllium bullied into giving you conscionable the outcomes you want.” - Clarence Thomas, yesterday

“Let’s bully Congress into giving america conscionable the outcomes we want.” - Ginni Thomas, January 6, 2021

— Tristan Snell (@TristanSnell) May 7, 2022

Women shouldn’t beryllium bullied to person babies by a Supreme Court that recognizes lone 1 religion arsenic legitimate, and seeks to enforce their idiosyncratic convictions upon the full country, contempt 70% of the state being against them.

— 𝔻𝕒𝕧𝕖 (@opusworks) May 7, 2022

Someone should inquire Thomas to specify the connection "bullying". Is it what helium did to Anita Hill?

— Rick (@response_w) May 7, 2022

So the Supreme Court justness whose woman sent substance messages pressuring White House unit to bash much to overturn a escaped and just predetermination doesn’t judge authorities officials should beryllium “bullied into delivering the preferred outcome?” Do tell. 🤦🏻

— Greg Pearson 🇺🇸😷🚴🏼‍♂️💉 (@GDNPearson) May 7, 2022

Shame Clarence Thomas didn't archer his woman Ginni to larn to "live with" the result of the 2020 election.

— Janice Hough (@leftcoastbabe) May 7, 2022
Read Entire Article