Letters to the Editor on the 125th Anniversary Issue

3 weeks ago 48

Book Review|Letters to the Editor connected the 125th Anniversary Issue

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/05/books/review/letters-to-the-editor-on-the-125th-anniversary-issue.html

Credit...Nick Misani

Nov. 5, 2021

To the Editor:

I settled successful Monday evening for a read-through of the 125th day issue (Oct. 24), expecting the accustomed slog, though a spot longer than accustomed (I didn’t decorativeness until Tuesday afternoon).

Pleasantly amazed to find a sampling of features and reviews crossed the Book Review’s lifespan, I made my mode done with the accustomed operation of smiles astatine well-turned phrases, shrugs astatine boring passages, annoyance astatine what I considered ill-considered opinions and chuckles astatine well-placed bons mots.

I was nearing the extremity erstwhile I reached Page 54 and the precocious Neil Sheehan’s essay connected the question of American warfare crimes successful Vietnam, which was primitively published not agelong earlier The Times’s work of the Pentagon Papers aft a agelong ineligible conflict with the ever-stonewalling Nixon administration, an accomplishment successful which Sheehan was instrumental.

Too young to person the work the portion erstwhile it archetypal published, I was rapt and impressed by its unfading relevance much than fractional a period aft it archetypal ran. I don’t usually clasp connected to day issues, but Sheehan’s effort and its timelessness made this a imperishable keeper.

Mac Brachman
Chicago

To the Editor:

I person mixed feelings skimming done the commemorative contented that marks the 125th day of the Book Review.

The good, and understandable part: Every leafage is filled with a past reappraisal by oregon astir immoderate singular writer oregon classical work. James Joyce, Toni Morrison, Colson Whitehead, Edith Wharton, Sandra Cisneros, Amy Tan, Vladimir Nabokov — connected and on.

The bad: It would instrumentality maine each week to work the damned thing. But it’s impressive.

David A. Scott
Columbus, Ohio

To the Editor:

Thank you for this unthinkable gift. Such marvelous pieces to work by truthful galore fantastic authors. And those letters to the Book Review are conscionable amazing.

This contented volition beryllium successful our location for a agelong clip to come, truthful that we tin prime it up astatine immoderate clip and bask reliving history.

Harvey Glassman
Boynton Beach, Fla.

To the Editor:

As a writer whose letters person occasionally appeared successful the Book Review, I assistance my pen to you. Your peculiar contented celebrating 125 years was remarkable. I was delighted to work everything from Mario Puzo’s review of William F. Buckley Jr.’s “The Jeweler’s Eye” to Herbert S. Gorman’s review of Countee Cullen’s “Color.”

Gorman lists 2 epitaphs by Cullen — of the two, I particularly similar this one:

FOR A LADY I KNOW

She adjacent thinks that up successful Heaven
Her people lies precocious and snores,
While mediocre achromatic cherubs emergence astatine 7
To bash celestial chores.

To the adjacent 125 years!

David Tulanian
Las Vegas

To the Editor:

Thank you and the publication publishers.

On a humorous note, I mightiness person included G. Gordon Liddy’s 1993 review of a Tom Clancy book, “Without Remorse.” Liddy wrote that Clancy’s statement of making a firearm suppressor was incorrect.

Michael Bogner
Bel Air, Md.

To the Editor:

What a unspeakable discarded of paper.

Salomon Lipiner
New York

Read Entire Article