Scottie Pippen Takes Aim at Michael Jordan in New Book

1 month ago 18

In a caller memoir, Pippen makes a crisp crook from decades of praising his erstwhile Chicago Bulls teammate to calling him selfish, hypocritical and insensitive.

In a caller   memoir titled “Unguarded,” Scottie Pippen said that helium  and Michael Jordan were ne'er  close.
Credit...Vincent Laforet/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Sopan Deb

Nov. 3, 2021, 2:37 p.m. ET

Scottie Pippen’s caller memoir, “Unguarded,” is simply a maestro people successful settling scores, oregon creating caller ones.

Beginning successful the prologue, Pippen expresses choler astatine Michael Jordan implicit “The Last Dance,” the 2020 ESPN documentary connected the 1990s Chicago Bulls, which Pippen writes “glorified Michael Jordan portion not giving astir capable praise to maine and my arrogant teammates.” Pippen gets much caustic from there.

“How situation Michael dainty america that mode aft everything we did for him and his precious brand,” Pippen writes, adding, “To marque things worse, Michael received $10 cardinal for his relation successful the doc portion my teammates and I didn’t gain a dime.” (Pippen and respective Bulls players appeared connected camera for the documentary. It has not been publically disclosed however overmuch Jordan, whose institution Jump 23 was portion of the project, made for the series.)

In effect to Jordan calling Pippen “selfish” successful the documentary for delaying a ft country and asking to beryllium traded, Pippen writes, “You privation to cognize what selfish is? Selfish is retiring close earlier the commencement of grooming campy erstwhile it is excessively precocious for the enactment to motion escaped agents,” a notation to Jordan’s unexpected archetypal status aft his father’s death. He calls Jordan hypocritical and insensitive. And helium criticizes Jordan for his behaviour toward co-workers: “Seeing again however poorly Michael treated his teammates, I cringed, arsenic I did backmost then.”

“Michael and I aren’t adjacent and ne'er person been,” Pippen writes.

That’s conscionable successful the opening pages. In the remainder of the book, Pippen takes shots astatine everyone from Charles Barkley (“wasn’t dedicated capable to triumph a championship”) to Isiah Thomas (“dirty” player, “with a knack for making the astir inappropriate comments”).

Pippen besides tees disconnected connected the erstwhile Bulls Coach Phil Jackson astir the famed infinitesimal successful 1994 erstwhile Pippen refused to re-enter a playoff crippled for the past 1.8 seconds aft Jackson drew up a play for Toni Kukoc alternatively of for him. After telling Dan Patrick successful a vigor interrogation earlier this twelvemonth that it was racist for Jackson to person done so, Pippen backs disconnected that assertion successful the book. Even so, Pippen writes that Jackson humiliated him and that “the infinitesimal of information had come, and helium had abandoned me.”

As unfastened arsenic Pippen is successful the book, helium seemed acold little consenting to prosecute with the worldly successful an interview. The speech implicit a video league became terse, and Pippen canceled a photograph sprout afterward.

This interrogation has been condensed and edited for clarity.

You travel from precise humble roots. You weren’t recruited by a immense school. You were underpaid compared with marketplace worth for a important play of your career. Is determination immoderate constituent successful your beingness erstwhile you didn’t consciousness overlooked? Because this publication seems to stem from a batch of you wanting to constitute your ain communicative and wanting to acceptable the grounds straight.

I deliberation I tin accidental determination was nary portion successful my beingness that I felt overlooked. That whitethorn beryllium your instrumentality of what you took from speechmaking the book, but I didn’t consciousness similar I was overlooked. I conscionable felt similar it was a antithetic travel than astir radical person traveled — who’s played connected a nonrecreational level, who’s had to spell to college.

From the opening pages of the book, you instrumentality a cudgel to Michael Jordan. Have you ever felt this mode and conscionable kept that wrong oregon did those feelings truly travel into absorption aft watching “The Last Dance”?

I deliberation he’s ever separated himself a small spot from what I see the accepted squad concept, successful immoderate sense. And I deliberation “The Last Dance” conscionable enactment the icing connected the cake. So it was each astir him astatine the extremity of the day.

One of the astir absorbing lines is erstwhile you write, “We didn’t triumph six championships due to the fact that helium got connected guys, we won successful spite of his getting connected guys.” And I thought that was truly interesting, due to the fact that Jordan’s attraction of teammates has agelong been heralded arsenic a virtue. Did you find it to beryllium unproductive?

Well, I can’t accidental I recovered it to beryllium unproductive, due to the fact that it was productive.

But you besides said that you guys won successful spite of it.

Well, we won erstwhile helium retired. We didn’t triumph a title, but evidently we didn’t person a afloat roster, so.

Do you interest that your publication volition make a imperishable divided betwixt you two?

To reply your question, no.

Have you fixed him immoderate benignant of heads up astir what you’re saying astir him?


You constitute that Isiah Thomas reached retired aft the documentary aired and wanted to state a truce with you. You said that you were unwilling to talk to him. Why is that?

Well, I played successful the league for 18 years and determination was ne'er a narration there. I’ve been retired of the league for 15 years, truthful wherefore now? It’s not similar we’re crossing each other’s paths anymore.

You constitute that the publication pushed you wherever you needed to beryllium pushed, adjacent to immoderate places you didn’t privation to go. What’s an illustration of a spot that you truly needed to propulsion to speech about? What places didn’t you privation to go?

I don’t privation to specifically constituent that out. I deliberation you should work the publication and fig it out. I’m not going to marque your occupation casual by getting immoderate contention connected that.

Your interrogation with Dan Patrick successful the outpouring made a batch of headlines. You said it was racist for Phil Jackson not to gully up the play for you successful the celebrated 1.8 2nd game. You walked that backmost successful the book. After you made those comments, did you perceive from erstwhile teammates astir it? What were you proceeding from radical and what made you locomotion that backmost successful the book?

What made maine locomotion it back?


I didn’t locomotion it back. I conscionable didn’t person it successful the book. I said it was astir apt not close for maine to accidental that astir Phil being racist astatine this stage. It’s h2o nether the span now. But astatine that constituent successful time, based connected wherever I was arsenic a player, the twelvemonth that I was having, I thought it was a atrocious determination connected his part.

When was the past clip you spoke to Phil Jackson?

I can’t recall.

Just to clarify, due to the fact that I conscionable privation to marque definite I don’t enactment words successful your mouth. You don’t deliberation that Phil was racist successful designating Toni Kukoc to instrumentality that past shot?

Did I accidental it? What are you asking?

OK, successful your book, and I’m quoting you present — —

Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Have you heard maine accidental that I said that?

Well, yeah, I watched the interview.

OK, truthful I said it. Now what are you asking me?

In your publication you write: “I was truthful wounded erstwhile helium picked Toni implicit maine that I needed to travel up with an mentation for wherefore I was rejected. For why, aft everything I had fixed to the Chicago Bulls, I wasn’t allowed to person my moment. So I told myself astatine the clip that Phil’s determination indispensable person been racially motivated, and I allowed myself to judge that prevarication for astir 30 years. Only erstwhile I saw my words successful people did it dawn connected maine however incorrect I was.” So you telephone it a lie. So I conscionable privation to clarify precisely what it is. Do you oregon bash you not judge that Phil was being racist erstwhile helium drew up that play?

I consciousness similar it was a infinitesimal wherever helium did maine wrong. How astir that? How astir I reply your question that way.

OK, just enough. What bash you deliberation is simply a large misconception astir you? Is determination thing that radical don’t cognize astir you that you would similar them to get to cognize astir you?

I’m private, truthful there’s not overmuch you tin larn astir me.

Read Entire Article